Free Reference

The Complete
IELTS Guide

Everything you need to understand the exam — structure, scoring, Writing criteria, skill strategies, and the mistakes that hold students back at every band level.

Section 01

Exam Structure

IELTS is divided into four skills tested over roughly 2 hours 45 minutes. There are two versions — Academic (for university and professional registration) and General Training (for migration and work experience). Listening and Speaking are identical in both.

Academic
General Training
Skill Time Questions / Tasks Format
Listening 30 min + 10 min transfer 40 questions / 4 sections Multiple choice, form completion, matching, map labelling, short answers
Reading 60 min 40 questions / 3 passages Academic: long academic texts (700–900 words each) · General: shorter everyday texts + one long passage
Writing 60 min 2 tasks Academic: Task 1 — data/graph description (150+ words) · Task 2 — discursive essay (250+ words) · General: Task 1 — letter
Speaking 11–14 min 3 parts (face-to-face) Part 1: Introduction & interview · Part 2: Individual long turn (cue card) · Part 3: Two-way discussion
Section 02

Band Scoring

IELTS uses a 9-band scale in 0.5 increments. Each skill receives an individual band, and the Overall band is the average of all four, rounded to the nearest 0.5.

Overall Band Formula
(Listening + Reading + Writing + Speaking) ÷ 4 → Round to nearest 0.5

Example: 7.0 + 6.5 + 6.0 + 6.5 = 26.0 ÷ 4 = 6.5 Overall

Rounding rule: .25 rounds up to .5 · .75 rounds up to next full band

Band Scale
Expert User 8.5–9
Very Good User 8.0
Good User 7.0–7.5
Competent User 6.0–6.5
Modest User 5.0–5.5
Limited User 4.0–4.5
Important rules
  • Each skill is scored independently — a weak Writing score cannot be offset by Reading.
  • Half bands exist (6.5, 7.5) — most universities and visa bodies specify minimum bands per skill.
  • Results are valid for 2 years from the test date.
  • You can retake IELTS as many times as needed — there is no waiting period.
Section 03

Band Targets by Goal

Different institutions set different thresholds. This is a general reference — always verify requirements directly with your target institution or authority.

UK University (UG)
Undergraduate admission
6.0–6.5

Most UK universities require Overall 6.0–6.5, often with no individual skill below 5.5–6.0.

UK University (PG)
Postgraduate / Master's
6.5–7.0

Russell Group institutions typically require Overall 7.0 with no skill below 6.5.

NMC Nursing Registration
UK Nursing & Midwifery Council
7.0 each

Minimum 7.0 in all four skills individually — Overall is not enough on its own.

UK Skilled Worker Visa
General Training (IELTS for UKVI)
4.0–6.0

Depends on role — minimum B1 (CEFR) in speaking & listening. Must use IELTS for UKVI version.

Australian Migration
General Skilled Migration
7.0–8.0

Points-based — higher bands earn more points. Competent English = 6.0 each; Proficient = 7.0 each.

Canadian Immigration
Express Entry / PNP
6.0–7.0

CLB 7 = roughly IELTS 6.0 per skill. Higher CLB improves CRS score for Express Entry draws.

Section 04

Writing: The Four Criteria

IELTS Writing is marked against four equally-weighted criteria. Each contributes 25% of the total Writing band. Understanding them precisely is the single fastest route to a higher score.

Criterion 01 · 25%

Task Achievement / Response

How fully and accurately you address all parts of the task. Task 2 measures argument development, position clarity, and the relevance of ideas. Task 1 measures how completely you describe the data or fulfil the letter purpose.

Band 5: Only partially addresses the task; ideas underdeveloped or off-topic.
Band 7: Main parts addressed; position clear; main ideas developed with relevant support.
Band 9: Fully addresses all requirements; ideas fully developed; position sophisticated.
Criterion 02 · 25%

Coherence & Cohesion

The logical flow and organisation of your writing. This covers paragraph structure, the sequencing of ideas, and the appropriate use of cohesive devices (linking words, referencing, substitution). Over-use of connectives is penalised as heavily as under-use.

Band 5: Inconsistent paragraphing; mechanical or overuse of cohesive devices.
Band 7: Clear progression; cohesive devices used flexibly; occasional lapses.
Band 9: Seamless cohesion; no sense of effort; paragraphing used skilfully throughout.
Criterion 03 · 25%

Lexical Resource

The range, accuracy, and appropriacy of your vocabulary. Examiners look for precise word choice, awareness of collocation, and the ability to paraphrase without distorting meaning. Repetition and over-reliance on basic words limits this score.

Band 5: Limited range; errors in word form; noticeable repetition.
Band 7: Sufficient range; some less common vocabulary; occasional errors in collocation.
Band 9: Full flexibility; natural idiomatic use; rare minor errors only.
Criterion 04 · 25%

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Both the variety of sentence structures you use and how correctly you use them. A band 7+ essay mixes complex and simple structures deliberately — overusing complex grammar with frequent errors is worse than writing simpler sentences accurately.

Band 5: Limited range; frequent errors; meaning sometimes unclear.
Band 7: Variety of structures; majority error-free; some errors do not impede communication.
Band 9: Wide range; full flexibility; virtually error-free throughout.

Task 1 — Data Description (Academic)

You have 20 minutes to write at least 150 words describing a visual (graph, chart, table, diagram, map, or process). You must select and report the key features — not interpret, not opinion.

Structure
  1. Paraphrase the question (1–2 sentences)
  2. Overview: 2 main trends, no data figures
  3. Body 1: Highest / most notable group
  4. Body 2: Comparisons / contrasts
Key rules
  • → Never give your opinion
  • → Include an overview (no overview = capped at Band 5)
  • → Use precise data: "rose by 15%" not "increased a lot"
  • → Use past tense for historical data, present for diagrams
Useful language
rose sharply · declined gradually · remained stable · accounted for · peaked at · fluctuated between · a significant proportion · in contrast to

Task 2 — Essay (Academic & General)

You have 40 minutes to write at least 250 words. Task 2 carries more weight than Task 1. There are five question types — each requires a different approach.

Question Type What it asks Recommended structure
Opinion / Agree-Disagree "To what extent do you agree or disagree?" Clear position intro → 2 body paragraphs supporting your view → conclusion restating position
Discussion "Discuss both views and give your opinion." Intro with balanced preview → View A body → View B body → Opinion in conclusion
Problem–Solution "What are the problems? What are the solutions?" Intro → Problems body → Solutions body → Conclusion
Advantages–Disadvantages "Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?" Position clear in intro → Advantages body → Disadvantages body → Conclusion with judgement
Two-Part Question "Why is X? What can be done about it?" Each question gets its own body paragraph — address both fully

Task 2 contributes approximately two-thirds of the total Writing band score.

See these criteria applied to your essay

Submit any Task 1 or Task 2 and get instant band scores across all four criteria.

Try Writing Clinic →
Section 05

All Four Skills

Reading

60 minutes · 40 questions · 3 passages. Academic texts are drawn from books, journals, and magazines — written for a non-specialist educated audience. No specialist knowledge is required. All answers are in the text.

Question Types
  • True / False / Not Given
  • Yes / No / Not Given (for opinions)
  • Matching headings to paragraphs
  • Matching information / features / sentence endings
  • Summary / note / table / diagram completion
  • Multiple choice
  • Short-answer questions
Strategy essentials
  • Read the questions before the passage — know what you're hunting.
  • T/F/NG: "Not Given" means the text is simply silent — not contradicting.
  • Matching headings: cover the options, find the main idea of each paragraph first.
  • Write answers directly on the answer sheet — there is no transfer time.
  • Allow ~20 minutes per passage; passage 3 is always hardest.

Listening

30 minutes of audio + 10 minutes to transfer answers. Four sections increasing in difficulty: social conversation → monologue → educational discussion → academic lecture.

Section structure
Section 1Social conversation · 2 speakers
Section 2Monologue · everyday context
Section 3Up to 4 speakers · educational
Section 4Academic lecture · no conversation
Key tips
  • Use the reading time before each section to predict answers.
  • Answers follow the order of the audio — do not skip ahead.
  • Spelling must be correct. "Fourty" for "Forty" is wrong.
  • Numbers, dates, and proper nouns are common trap items in Sections 1 & 2.

Speaking

11–14 minutes with a trained examiner. Marked on the same four criteria as Writing (Fluency & Coherence, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range & Accuracy, Pronunciation). It is conducted on a different day to the other skills.

Part 1 · 4–5 min
Introduction & Interview

Familiar topics: family, hobbies, work, hometown. Aim for extended answers (2–4 sentences) not one-word replies.

Part 2 · 3–4 min
Long Turn (Cue Card)

1 minute to prepare, 2 minutes to speak. Use the 4 bullet points on the card. Running out of things to say = fluency penalty.

Part 3 · 4–5 min
Two-Way Discussion

Abstract, society-level questions linked to Part 2 topic. Here you're expected to speculate, analyse, and justify — this separates band 6 from band 7+.

Section 06

Common Mistakes by Band Level

Most students plateau because they repeat the same errors. These are the patterns that separate each band level — based on real examiner feedback.

5.0–5.5 Stuck here

Writing Task 2 without a clear position — sitting on the fence when the question asks for your view.

Omitting the overview in Task 1. This hard-caps Task Achievement at Band 5.

Writing under 250 words in Task 2 — automatic penalty regardless of quality.

Reading answers: confusing "False" and "Not Given" — the most common single-point loss.

Speaking Part 2: stopping before the 2 minutes, or reading notes rather than speaking naturally.

6.0–6.5 Stuck here

Over-using connectives ("Furthermore, Moreover, In addition, Additionally" — all in one essay).

Vocabulary: relying on the same high-frequency words (important, significant, many, a lot of).

Attempting complex grammar but making errors that impede meaning — safer to use accurate simple structures.

Listening: missing Section 3 & 4 because the accent or academic vocabulary is unfamiliar.

Speaking: using filler phrases ("you know", "like") too frequently — flags as low fluency.

7.0–7.5 Stuck here

Writing essays that are "competent but safe" — no sophisticated argument development, just making points.

Lexical Resource: near-misses in collocation (e.g. "make a crime" instead of "commit a crime").

Reading: spending too long on one difficult question instead of moving on and returning.

Speaking Part 3: giving short answers to abstract questions instead of developing a full analytical response.

Pronunciation: stress patterns — misplacing stress on multi-syllable words reduces intelligibility even at high fluency.

Ready to improve?

Put this guide into practice

Submit an essay and see your band across all four criteria, or take a full timed mock test — free to start.